They are strong enough lyrically to garner a fanbase. This is because, while the lower-tier rapper has the hunger to master his craft, the mainstream rapper has simply figured out the keys to success. But the battle would still be even despite the clear difference in skill. Back in the 90s and early 00s, a rapper who has reached the heights of success would often end up in a verbal war of words against a lower-tier rapper, who is often more lyrically gifted than the mainstream rapper. Those of us who are embedded deeply into the hip-hop culture-enough to look past the mainstream representation of the art that is force-fed to the world-know that rap battles have long been an important part of the culture. On the other hand, James Patterson’s strength lies in figuring out the right formula for success, and not necessarily being a craft wizard.Ī strong parallel of this argument comes to mind as a rap music fan. To the point that his works were often groundbreaking. Stephen King is clearly a writer who has spent years draining the ink from his pens while perfecting his craft.

Much of this debate comes down to what you perceive to be “good writing.” Stephen King and James Patterson respectively are the perfect contrast of what many would feel is the difference between good writing and average writing. As with any form of art, writing is subjective.